安全仪表系统的十个事实之六(中英文对照) 点击:304 | 回复:1



siren

    
  • 精华:36帖
  • 求助:0帖
  • 帖子:426帖 | 6724回
  • 年度积分:0
  • 历史总积分:21846
  • 注册:2002年3月09日
发表于:2008-01-04 14:09:00
楼主

TRUTH # 6
You don't have to choose between
Safety Instrumented System (SIS) separation and Basic Process Control System (BPCS) integration; you can have BOTH

BPCS INTEGRATION allows a plant operator to monitor process conditions and prevent hazards while monitoring the health of the control system. Pressure to reduce costs and to single-source control system hardware should not be justification for combining safety system functionality and basic process regulatory control.

Good engineering standards and practices, government regulations, recommendations by experienced experts, and common sense dictates that these functions be separated.

The industry is leaning toward independent layers of protection to maintain strict physical separation and diversity between process control and safety instrumented functions. Integration is performed at the information, configuration, and HMI levels.

Is your SIS architecture forcing you to choose between separation and integration, or is it able to provide both?

To read Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine’s September 2006 article titled, “Where to draw the Line – The problem of integrating control and safety effectively,” go to www.triconex.com/truth6.




siren

  • 精华:36帖
  • 求助:0帖
  • 帖子:426帖 | 6724回
  • 年度积分:0
  • 历史总积分:21846
  • 注册:2002年3月09日
发表于:2008-05-09 18:18:05
1楼
当监视控制系统的健康时,BPCS集成允许工厂操作员监视过程条件,并防止危险。对结合安全系统功能和基本过程调节控制来说,降低成本的压力和单一控制系统硬件来源的压力是不合理的。
良好的工程标准和实践经验、政府法规、有经验的专家推荐和常识都规定应该隔离这些功能。
工业倾向于独立层保护从而保持严格的物理隔离和过程控制与安全仪表功能之间的差异。在信息、组态和HMI等级完成集成。
你的SIS架构迫使你在隔离和集成之间作出选择吗?或它能同时提供吗?

热门招聘
相关主题

官方公众号

智造工程师